The Rat Fan Club
Book Reviews:
Fiction
by Debbie
“The Rat Lady”
Book Review: Firmin
This
short novel written by Sam Savage was first published in 2006, but the edition
I read was published in 2009 by Bantam Dell and included drawings by Fernando Krahn. It is written in a literary style, which I have
never liked. To me books like this just seem to wander around and don’t
go anywhere. I guess their purpose is to let the main character say whatever he
wants to. It makes sense to me that Sam Savage has a degree in philosophy.
This
book is supposedly written by Firmin, a small
strangely shaped, peculiar rat who can read, watches movies in a run-down
theater, wishes he was Fred Astaire
and lusts after human women. He is a morose character who considers himself
ugly, dislikes other rats, and lives by himself above a bookstore. He is really
not much like a rat, but seems to be only a character created to comment on
human life. The story takes place in a run-down area of
There
are a few statements in the book that are wrong in regards real rats. Firmin says he can’t laugh, but scientific studies
show rats make ultrasonic chirps in the same circumstances that humans laugh,
for instance, when playing and being tickled, which some scientists and all rat
lovers believe is actual laughter. Firmin says the
other rats tended to avoid the theater he liked because of a voracious population
of fleas and lice. However, while fleas will bite both humans and rats, human
lice won’t bite rats, and vice versa. Worst of all, Firmin tries to learn sign language to communicate
with humans, but complains that sign language was intended “for creatures
equipped with fingers” and he found it impossible because he has paws.
Now come on, rats do have fingers! No thumbs, but definitely fingers. And
how can Firmin play the piano but can’t manage
sign language? Finally, this is probably nit-picking, but a drawing showing
Jerry selling his books out of a wagon shows a wagon completely different to
what Firmin carefully described in the story.
Parts
of this story are vulgar and border on obscenity, so this book is definitely
not for children. If you like this kind of stream-of-conscious writing you
might like this book., but you won’t learn much
about rats in it.
Book Review: Rats
Incredible, An Illustrated Dictionary of Rats
This humorous book was written and illustrated by Ryn Gargulinski, and published by
WeiserBooks in 2006. A note in the back of the book says the
author/artist was at one time president of the Northeast Rat & Mouse
Club’s
The
introduction to the book, titled inaugu-rat-ion,
consists of 5 jokes in the format of a myth with its supposedly corresponding
reality. Some of the realities are
true, and try to convince people rats really do make good pets, and some are
just silly. Here is one
example: “Myth: Rats have rabies. Reality: Junkies have rabies.”
In
the rest of the book, pages 2 to 71, each pair of pages features a word
containing the syllable “rat” and its definition, along with an
illustration. My favorite was
“ado-rat-ion: extreme affection, like rats have for spaghetti
sauce.” I also liked “i-rat-e: extreme anger shown when your rat bangs his empty
water bottle you neglected to fill.”
The viewpoint this book takes will certainly give rat lovers some
chuckles. However, some of the
humor is a little raw. The drawing
to accompany “rat hole” shows a rat with a hole through his middle,
and one of the jokes protests that rats don’t really eat small
children…only dead small children.
Book Review: Little
Rat Makes Music
This
book was written by Monika Bang-Campbell, illustrated by Molly Bang, and
published by Harcourt, Inc. in 2007.
Although it is a children’s book, recommended for ages
Book Review: The
Short and Incredibly Happy Life of Riley
Written
and illustrated by Colin Thompson and Amy Lissiat,
this 28-page picture book was published in the
Riley
is a wild rat (we learn this through the pictures, we are not told this
directly in the story, although the back cover of the book says, “Rats
live for quite a short time and for most of that time they are very, very
happy….”) and all the rats have pink ears, tails, and hands and
feet, but that’s because their whole body is pink too. So to me it looked like a whole family
of hairless rats living in the wild, which of course is not very likely. In most of the pictures they are very
cute. However, their noses are
black, and their muzzles are smeared with red, which made it look to me like
they were dipped in blood. The
picture where Riley is eating a slug is rather ugly, not because of the slug,
but because they gave him the mouth and teeth of a shrew, not a rat.
Riley
is happy about everything in his life and the story contrasts Riley’s
happiness with how most people are dissatisfied with everything in their life
and always looking for something better or different. The style of the
illustrations are unique. I
found a picture of a human baby stuffing his mouth with a huge cheeseburger
disgusting, but I’m sure that was their intention.
The
creators of the book may have made Riley a rat because rats are so similar to
humans, yet they seem so simple.
However, it seems to me that only the very stupidest rat would be
completely satisfied with his life, no matter what it is like. Don’t your
rats always want something more and something better? Most of my rats would rather have
avocado than broccoli, and they always want more time out of their cage to
play. However, the main point of the book is of course correct: that everyone would
be a lot happier if they were more satisfied with what they already have. This
book is really not meant for rat lovers, but most of the drawings of the rats
are endearing… especially the one showing a huge pile of sleeping pink
babies.
Book Review: Walter, The
Story of a Rat
(This review appeared in the May 2007 issue of the Rat Report.)
I
received this book as a gift from my friend Marg
Smith. Walter, The Story of a Rat was written by
Barbara Wersba, illustrated by Donna Diamond. It has 60 pages and was published by
The
first sentence of the book tells us that Walter was a very old rat. In fact, he was much older than most
rats and he is also unusual because he can read. He doesn’t know why either of
these facts should be so. Walter has come to live in the home of Amanda
Pomeroy, an older woman who writes children’s books. He starts reading the books in her
library. He is very sad that most
humans hate rats or are scared of them.
When he discovers Miss Pomeroy’s books and begins to read them, he
is shocked that all the characters in her books are mice. He also discovers that other
children’s books often include mice, but not rats. “Why doesn’t anyone write
about rats?” he wonders.
Walter
decides to leave a note for Miss Pomeroy on her desk, and to his surprise and
delight, she writes him a note back.
They begin a regular correspondence and gradually form a friendship. One day Walter gets up the courage to
ask her why she writes about mice instead of rats. She tells Walter about some books that
do include rats. First is
“the story of ‘The Pied Piper of Hamelin,’ in which all the
rats, unfortunately, are led away to their doom.” Next is The Wind in the Willows, and the Harry
Potter books. She says that Oscar
Wilde mentions a rat in a fairy tale in his book The Devoted Friend. And
finally she recommends The Boy, the Rat,
and the Butterfly, by Beatrice Schenk De Regniers. All these books actually exist!
It’s
obvious that both the author and illustrator are familiar with rats and some of
their behaviors. Walter takes his
name from a book he found in the dump by Sir Walter Scott. Walter felt that this author was
obviously an important man because his books were bound in leather. “Walter ate most of the leather,
but left the pages intact.”
Once settled in Miss Pomeroy’s house, Walter did most of his
reading at night by candlelight, “though he had an unfortunate tendency
to nibble on the candles….”
However,
there are two statements in the book that I disagree with. At one point the book says, “Rats
are not good climbers,” because most rats are quite good at climbing. And
Walter says that he had always been kind and considerate and can remember
committing only one crime.
“In a moment of hunger and confusion he had eaten two of his
offspring, but he had been only eight months old at the time—a young,
impetuous rat—and he had never done it again.” It is unlikely in the extreme that any
rat would eat his own offspring because there are biological factors that
prevent it. As the main theme of
this book seems to be to present rats in a positive light, I can’t figure
out why the author would have included this.
Most
of the illustrations are fairly realistic and captivating, although
Walter’s tail is often too long and thin. It also bothered me that Walter’s
eyes were drawn light-colored (the illustrations are in black and white).
In some pictures it makes it look like Walter has cataracts. Maybe the artist thought it would be
easier to give Walter personality or a more human look that way.
Overlooking
the few flaws, this is a very enjoyable book with a touching story. It would be a good addition to any rat
lover’s library.
Book Review: Rosie’s
Birthday Rat
(This
review appeared in the February 1999 issue of the Rat Report.)
Published
in 1996 by Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc., this is a delightful
book with scenes that will be familiar to any rat lover. The author, Linda Glaser, is a rat
lover, and currently has a rat named Sunny. The illustrator, Nancy Poydar, must be a rat lover too since she has drawn
The
story begins when Rosie announces that the only gift she wants for her birthday
is a rat. Rosie’s mother
strongly objects, and presents all sorts of reasons why she doesn’t want
a rat in the house. One of these
reasons is that the family already has a cat. But Rosie successfully counters all her
mother’s arguments, and gets her mother to agree.
They
go to a snake store, where Rosie’s teacher got a rat, and in choosing a rat, Rosie helps convince the clerk that rats make good
pets.
The
next morning Rosie is faced with a tragedy.
The
only thing that would have made this book better is if it had mentioned that
it’s good to have more than one rat.
While it’s perfectly reasonable that Rosie would ask for—and
convince her mother to let her have—just one rat, Rosie said, “We
had a rat in my kindergarten. We
had a rat in my first grade. Now we
have a rat in my second grade.”
Rosie could have just as easily said, “We had two
rats....” But other than this
point, I highly recommend this charming story.
Rat of the Week | News | Rat Info | Adopt a Rat
Reviews | Rat Books | Merchandise | Special Events
Meet the Ratlady
| Links | Home
Rat Fan Club,
Copyright 1999-2010